Monday 20 June 2011

Not a smashing idea?


Glass bottles, smashed, everywhere I cycle, I have to be careful to avoid riding over the millions of shards of broken glass, that you can find pretty much anywhere that you can walk or cycle. A task pretty much impossible when its wet, as they then become invisible (ever wondered why you get more punctures when it's been raining?). Dogs aren't so lucky as they have no idea about broken glass, until they slice open their paws, bleed all over the carpets and their owners have to soak up the expense of vets bills.

So where is all this broken glass coming from? The surprisingly high number of idiots out there who think the best thing to do with an empty bottle is to smash it on the ground/wall/someones head, especially if it is an underpass with narrow passage, making it difficult to avoid riding/walking over it. I think it is unlikely we will be able to do anything about the idiot hoard anytime soon, but there may be a simple solution to the broken glass problem.

Laminate the bottles. Simple. Bottle gets smashed - all the glass remains inside the laminate skin. No bits of glass everywhere. Easy to recover and recycle.

It would be unthinkable (in fact illegal) for plate glass, vehicle windows etc. to made of ordinary glass. Most windows are made of toughened glass and to further increase the safety, a layer of laminate is applied so that in the event of breakage, the glass won't shatter all over the ground. So surely, it can't be that difficult to modify the production of certain class of bottles (namely the ones likely to end up smashed on the ground - beer bottles, and generally any bottles containing drinks bought from typical grocers), so that there is some means of containing the glass if the bottle breaks? Some bottles already have a 'shrink wrap' label that keeps the whole bottle contained, but this will probably be rejected as it isn't such an aesthetically pleasing label. Perhaps bottles could be dipped in a cellulose based (green/recyclable) dip that could for a protective skin around the bottle?


Whatever the exact solution, it isn't rocket science, but it is urgently needed. Who wants the town centre to be a sea of broken glass every Friday/Saturday night? Who wants broken glass in the park where their children play and dogs run around? Who wants chunks of glass sticking out of their bicycle tyres on their Monday morning commute? Nobody does! Time to get 'safety bottles' as standard and get rid of the broken glass menace once and for all!

Photo nicked from: http://groundlessmind.blogspot.com/2010/08/in-my-head_17.html thanks!

Saturday 22 January 2011

CUBA - EXPERIENCED!!!


Well 2 weeks in Cuba is really just a taster - but for for first time - it will do for now! The thing you come away with is just how good the people are! You can be in the most dodgy run-down and scary place, but you can be pretty sure that nothing will happen to you - well it's the law there but still!

The whole country is like a living working museum, you see things there you will not really be likely to see anywhere else in the world, in fact many parts there - the industrial revolution is something that is simply known about and nothing more!

Havana is pretty full on and intense, while the pollution from all the old vehicles is really bad, the old buildings in all sorts of states of dis/repair are quite a sight! By night with poor lighting and no idea of how or what is around - can be pretty dis-orientating! Once you find your feet you soon get more comfortable there and can start to enjoy it. You will never be far from a more than willing taxi driver or bici-taxi to take you anywhere ;-)

See some pix of La Havana here >>>

Photos now gone from Picasaweb sorry!

Trinidad in the south was reminiscent of Granada Spain set in a tropical coastline scene. Will blog this more if I can!

More photos soon - when I get a chance!!

Thursday 14 October 2010

Oh yeah - I've got a blog!

I had forgotten my (hardly used) blog - poor thing!

So - today I am sucking down an Ubuntu 10.10 iso - hoping it takes less than an hour via torrent - then take it to lab for deployment - even though I'm sure they already have this version...

Also tried to get some life out of this bare bonez shuttle I rescued...little mobo light comes on and slight fuzz sound from psu - nada mas....

Not having so much luck with found hardware in recent times - the Toughbook CR-52 found put out with the rubbish with sticker on it saying "Works but no HD or RAM" was evidently a lie. It is dead. Right down to the onboard discreet fuses not being the cause of death....I suspect it either the power supply it was put out with - a 19v when it should be a 15.5v, or someone thought it would be a good idea to test out it's toughness by dipping it into the bath....May never know. Will have to sell for spares I think...

Monday 18 January 2010

Web browser wars steps up a level!

Posted by Picasa After the German government advises people not to use M$ Internet Explorer on the back of the recent cyber attacks (via IE) in China, Google is clearly aiming to take a big chunk of the web browser market. I can't recall ever seeing a full size bilboard poster advert campaign (as seen here outside Tesco's in Eastville, Bristol) to promote a web browser before!

They mean business, and it is business - after all, the more of us that use Google Chrome - the more money Google make, and with the browser shaping up nicely with it's ChromeOS netbook operating system following closely behind, and recent entry into the mobile phone market, it is obvious that Google is clearly up for challenging the global domination that M$ has enjoyed for the last couple of decades! And good luck to them.

But can they really be trusted? Already many people shun the temptations of their very competitive products and services due to their 'imaginative' privacy policies, so although they may be champions of the open-source software movement (citation needed!), it can be argued that they are simply using the best tools available to conduct their business and make money - selling our profile data - anonymized or not....

Friday 2 October 2009

'New' Banksy found?



A fine example of his early work, recently uncovered in an old garage in St Andrews?

Tuesday 8 September 2009

G-ification of Linux system backend?



Linux is moving fast - improving/developing at an impressive pace - so much so, that it is difficult to keep up with the latest developments and changes - so much so, that we often don't even know about a change until it hits our desktop - often a year or more since the change was made!

And I notice a trend happening here - yep, the removal of the core 'backend' config tools: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg, alsaconf, and even xorg.conf itself!

Now, it will be argued that Linux has improved so much that these tools are simply not needed any more, however - it is patently obvious to all from the Linux community forums, that these utils have been removed without substitution, leaving users who's systems have gone blank/quiet after upgrades etc. in the dark as to what to do next.

OK I do appreciate that things shouldn't be any more complicated than they need to be, and if something can just work without the user needing to even know about the possible configs - thats can be fine, *but* - where is the option to tweak/alter/adjust if we so want/need to? Isn't choice a fundamental core of the open source movement?

Is it our fault that a 'major change' to how an app/driver works isn't known about until it slaps (or doesn't!) us in the face?

Do we still have to put up with arrogant Linux devs telling us to RTFM?!

I don't think I am too happy about having 'functionality' being removed without decent explanation or equivalent/alternative choice available. I'm all for having a system that just works - but there is a fine line between that and a system lacking in simple and obvious config options!

Tuesday 28 July 2009

The Big Green Gathering is dead! Long live The Big Green Gathering!!


After a years gap with no Big Green Gathering, we were all set to have a stonking time this year and all set up to do so - time and money spent in preparation for what would have been a great event. But it wasn't to be. It soon became apparent that the powers that be had other plans. The result was The BGG having no option than to hand back the license to Mendip district council and announce that the Big Green Gathering 2009 was canceled. The exact details of how this situation have been written about already ( more here), and there is no question about the financial reputation of the BGG based on previous disasters, this simply made it easier for those who wanted to stop the BGG to achieve their aims.

The repercussions of the cancellation, however, may be far worse for the powers that be than they realize, as it seems likely the majority of people planning to attend, are law abiding citizens from a very broad range of backgrounds, who now feel pretty angry about what has happened, and will no doubt not be content to sit back and say "Oh well - they should have been better organized", but likely react to this blatant attack on the green movement, by using the same powers they used against the BGG - the law! And then there are those who were/are already there, plus the hundreds who have nowhere else to be anyway, now have to find somewhere else to go, which will pose even greater potential problems for the authorities.


Essentially what has happened will likely be seen as an act of war against the Green/environmental movement, and not be seen as a blanket punishment caused my the 'naughty' minority of activists who had planned to be at BGG, but a blatant move by the powers that be, to crush any attempts to protest against anything - be it war, environment or politics. This will simply result in any movement going (further) underground in order to realize it's aims, aims which, in the case of the climate protest/eco campaigns, movements that governments should really be opening up to, and taking on board their views. Of course government is simply a tool for the management of the population, for use of 'the powers that be' to meet their aims, which certainly aren't compatible with any green policy/ideology, which seems to be a pretty depressing reality that the majority of the population doesn't seem to realize.




The direct effect of the event being stopped is the bankrupting of numerous business and individuals, some people had re-mortgaged their homes to raise cash to meet the spiraling costs demanded by the authorities, whilst others who depended on the revenue raised at the BGG now face bankruptcy including, apparently, Croissant Neuf - one of the biggest venues at the BGG.

All in all, it seems all too apparent, that the Green movement is under attack from the defenders of the multinational corpocracies, and that if you are thinking of actually doing something about what you believe in - be prepared to face up to the state, dressed in full riot gear and teams of fat back-pocketed legal teams ready to stitch you up, label you a terrorist, and send you down.

The BGG have stated on their website that they will be back, and no doubt the green movement will rally round to help recover the costs, and hopefully we shall see BGG's in the future, right now - people are sorely pissed and it remains to be seen what they are gonna do about it - but one thing is for sure - it ain't gonna be to "Shut up, and be happy"!!

Here are a few photos of the BGG 2009 during the preceding weekend.


Labels

animals (1) art (1) banksy (1) bash (1) beer (1) Big Green Gathering (1) bottles (1) cabinet office (1) chese (1) chrome (1) cider (1) Climate (1) copyleft (1) crap (1) cuba holiday (1) customer service (1) cycling (1) danny macaskill (1) dogs (1) drink (1) etc. (1) Freedom (1) friends (1) funny (1) geek (1) glass (1) google (1) governmnent (1) Green (1) health (1) idiots (1) IT (1) linux (2) media (1) microsoft (1) mtb (1) open source (1) open-source (1) problems (1) Protest (1) rail (1) safety (1) spirits (1) street (1) sweet (1) trails (1) trainline (1) trains (1) transport (1) unicode (1) windows (1) wine (1)